Yield Estimator.
Yield Estimator
Crop + method + DLI + plant count → realistic yield range. Use for planning, contracts, and reality-checking expectations.
Reference yield ranges
| Crop | Per plant (typical) | Per ft² | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cannabis flower (indoor) | 50–250 g dried | 1.0–2.0 g/W | Wide range; plant size, training, and light dominate |
| Cannabis flower (outdoor) | 100–1500+ g dried | — | Full-season outdoor; major variance by climate, cultivar, plant size |
| Tomato (indoor commercial) | 10–25 lb / vine | 0.5–1.5 lb/ft²/wk | Per-week harvest in continuous greenhouse |
| Tomato (outdoor field) | 5–15 lb / plant | — | Season-total |
| Pepper (bell) | 3–8 lb / plant | — | Season-total |
| Cucumber (greenhouse) | 50–150 fruits / plant | 2–4 lb/ft²/cycle | Continuous setting |
| Lettuce (head) | 0.4–0.8 lb / head | 0.5–1.5 head/ft² | Per cycle; faster cycles in indoor |
| Basil | 0.5–1 lb / plant | — | First cut; multiple harvests possible |
| Strawberry (indoor / greenhouse) | 1–3 lb / plant / season | 0.5–1 lb/ft² | Day-neutral varieties |
| Microgreens | — | 0.5–1 lb / 10×20 tray | 7-21 day cycles |
| Mushroom (oyster) | 30-50% biological efficiency | — | BE = harvest weight / dry substrate weight × 100 |
Why so much variance
The same cultivar in the same room with the same recipe can yield 30% more or less than a previous cycle for many reasons:
- Genetics — phenotype variation; even identical-clone groups have variance
- Environmental stability — sustained on-target VPD/temp/CO₂ vs erratic conditions
- Light delivery — actual canopy DLI vs. nominal; uniformity across canopy
- Nutrition timing — feeds at right ppm, runoff EC managed, deficiency caught early
- Pest / disease pressure — even minor mite or PM hits cost yield
- Training — topping, defoliation, and canopy management
- Stress events — equipment failures, power blips, schedule errors
- Substrate health — fresh vs aged; biological community present in living soil
- Grower attention — daily observation catches problems that monthly observation misses
The "range" you see in this estimator captures most of this variance. Top quartile vs bottom quartile in a real facility is often 2× difference for the same nominal setup.
g-per-watt benchmarks (cannabis)
The cannabis industry traditionally tracks yield per watt of lighting:
| g/W | Tier | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| < 0.7 | Beginner / inefficient | First cycles, uncalibrated equipment, weak genetics |
| 0.7–1.0 | Functional hobby | Most home grows; reasonable result |
| 1.0–1.5 | Solid commercial | Tuned room, decent genetics, IPM diligent |
| 1.5–2.0 | Top-tier commercial | Best-in-class facilities; tuned every variable |
| 2.0–2.5 | Exceptional | Modern high-PPE LEDs, CO₂-enriched, expert genetics |
| > 2.5 | Marketing claims | Sometimes seen on websites; rarely third-party verified |
g/W is increasingly being replaced by g/mol (yield per mole of light delivered) because LED efficiency improvements make watts a moving target. 1 g/W on a PPE 2.5 fixture ≠ 1 g/W on a PPE 1.7 HPS fixture — different photon delivery per watt.
Free under CC BY 4.0. Cite as "OAT Yield Estimator (openagriculturetechnology.com)". Synthesized from agronomy literature and grower community reports.